Pesachim 75

Pesachim 75b ~ Burns and Ritual Impurity

The Torah details lots of rules about skin blemishes known as tzaraat. One of these blemishes is the result of a burn:

ויקרא 13:24

אוֹ בָשָׂר כִּי־יִהְיֶה בְעֹרוֹ מִכְוַת־אֵשׁ וְהָיְתָה מִחְיַת הַמִּכְוָה בַּהֶרֶת לְבָנָה אֲדַמְדֶּמֶת אוֹ לְבָנָה׃ וְרָאָה אֹתָהּ הַכֹּהֵן וְהִנֵּה נֶהְפַּךְ שֵׂעָר לָבָן בַּבַּהֶרֶת וּמַרְאֶהָ עָמֹק מִן־הָעוֹר צָרַעַת הִוא בַּמִּכְוָה פָּרָחָה וְטִמֵּא אֹתוֹ הַכֹּהֵן נֶגַע צָרַעַת הִוא׃ 

When the skin of one’s body sustains a burn by fire, and the patch from the burn is a discoloration, either white streaked with red, or white, the priest shall examine it. If some hair has turned white in the discoloration, which itself appears to go deeper than the skin, it is leprosy that has broken out in the burn. The priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is a leprous affection.

In today’s page of Talmud we read more about this case of tzaraat caused by a skin burn.

פסחים עה, ב

״מִכְוַת אֵשׁ״ — אֵין לִי אֶלָּא שֶׁנִּכְוָה בְּאֵשׁ וּבְגַחֶלֶת. נִכְוָה בְּרֶמֶץ, בְּסִיד רוֹתֵחַ, וּבְגִפְסִיס רוֹתֵחַ, וּבְכׇל דָּבָר הַבָּא מֵחֲמַת הָאוּר, לְאֵיתוֹיֵי חַמֵּי הָאוּר, מִנַּיִין? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״מִכְוָה״ ״מִכְוָה״ רִיבָּה

From the phrase “a burn from fire,” I only know that if someone was burned by a fire or by a coal he is subject to the laws of tzaraat of a fire. With regard to one who is burned by hot ash, by burning lime, or by burning plaster, or by anything else that is burning and whose source of heat comes from fire, to include water heated by fire, from where is it derived that these cases are also considered a burn from fire? The verse states: A burn, a burn, twice. By repeating the term, it includes all these types of burns.

The Classification of Burns

The modern classification of burn severity is based on two features: the depth of the burn, and the amount of skin (the surface area) that is burned.

Three kinds of burn.jpg

First degree or superficial burns involve only the very superficial layer of skin called the epidermis. There is pain and redness, but there are no blisters and the wound is dry. This is commonly the burn you get with sunburn. Second degree or partial thickness burns involve two layers of skin, the epidermis and the dermis. These are painful, red and moist, and will form blisters over the first 24 hours. Third degree of full thickness burns go deeper into the subcutaneous tissues. They are red and white, and do not produce blisters. Fourth degree burns are deeper still; they involve the fascia and bone. The tissues are white and charred and again, no blisters are formed.

In addition to the depth of the burn they are classified by the area of skin involved. Burns that cover more than about 50% of the total surface area of the body are often fatal.

The Mishnaic Classification of Burns

The Mishnah in Nega’im discusses burns in the context of ritual impurity

נגעים 9:1

.. אֵיזֶה הוּא הַשְּׁחִין? לָקָה בְעֵץ אוֹ בְאֶבֶן אוֹ בְגֶפֶת אוֹ בְמֵי טְבֶרְיָא, כֹּל שֶׁאֵינוֹ מֵחֲמַת הָאֵשׁ, זֶה הוּא שְׁחִין. אֵיזוֹ הִיא מִכְוָה? נִכְוָה בְגַחֶלֶת אוֹ בְרֶמֶץ, כֹּל שֶׁהוּא מֵחֲמַת הָאֵשׁ, זוֹ הִיא מִכְוָה 

What is a "boil"? An injury received from wood, stone, peat, or the waters of Tiberius, or from any other object whose heat is not due to fire is a boil. What exactly is a "burn"? A burn caused by a live coal, hot embers, or any object whose heat is due to fire is a burning.

Burns, Fluid Loss and Skin Discharges

If it is not immediately clear why a burn should be associated with ritual impurity, remember that burns of a second degree or worse produce a yellow-green discharge (or more properly, an exudate. In fact in severe burns (second degree burns that involve more than about 15% of the body surface area) the fluid loss is so massive that if left untreated the patient will die of dehydration. To prevent this physicians use a general formula that guides the volume of fluids that should be provided to the burn patient in the first 4 hours:

Total amount of fluid to be given in the first four hours (cc) = weight (kg) x %body surface area involved/2.

Types of exudate (discharge) seen in burns. From Vowden P, Bond E. Meuleneire F. Managing high viscosity exudate. Wounds International 2015: 6 (1):

Types of exudate (discharge) seen in burns. From Vowden P, Bond E. Meuleneire F. Managing high viscosity exudate. Wounds International 2015: 6 (1):

And here is what the discharge from a burn can look like:

From Vowden P, Bond E. Meuleneire F. Managing high viscosity exudate. Wounds International 2015: 6 (1):

From Vowden P, Bond E. Meuleneire F. Managing high viscosity exudate. Wounds International 2015: 6 (1):

Yes, I agree. Nasty. But now let’s briefly turn to another kind of discharge, found in the person described in the Torah as a zov. In Leviticus chapter 15 we find the laws of the זב – zov - a man who experiences a discharge from his penis.

ויקרא טו, ב–ג

אִישׁ אִישׁ כִּי יִהְיֶה זָב מִבְּשָׂרוֹ זוֹבוֹ טָמֵא הוּא. וזֹאת תִּהְיֶה טֻמְאָתוֹ בְּזוֹבוֹ רָר בְּשָׂרוֹ אֶת־זוֹבוֹ אוֹ־הֶחְתִּים בְּשָׂרוֹ מִזּוֹבוֹ טֻמְאָתוֹ הִוא

When any man has a discharge issuing from his member, he is unclean. The uncleanness from his discharge shall mean the following—whether his member runs with the discharge or is stopped up so that there is no discharge, his uncleanness means this…

As we have noted previously, the condition that is described is gonorrhea. The word gonorrhea is from the Greek roots gone meaning seed and rhein, meaning flow, and so the description of this sexually transmitted disease is found in its very name. That flow is a a thick yellow-green discharge from the penis or vagina, and yes, it looks very similar to the discharge that can be seen with severe burns.

Note how similar it is to exudate from a burn. (And next time, please wear a glove.)

Note how similar it is to exudate from a burn. (And next time, please wear a glove.)

Genital discharges from gonorrhea are thick and yellow-green. So too are the discharges from a deep burn. Both are not only physically uncomfortable, but once, long ago, rendered a person ritually impure. Be careful to avoid both.

Print Friendly and PDF

Pesachim 75a ~ Where Does Lead Come From?

On this page of Talmud there is an excursus into a particularly brutal form of capital punishment called serefa, or burning. This punishment involved pouring molten lead down the throat of the condemned person. Among other unfortunates, it was administered to the married daughter of a Cohen who committed adultery.

ויקרא 21:9

וּבַת אִישׁ כֹּהֵן כִּי תֵחֵל לִזְנוֹת אֶת־אָבִיהָ הִיא מְחַלֶּלֶת בָּאֵשׁ תִּשָּׂרֵף׃

When the daughter of a priest defiles herself through harlotry, it is her father whom she defiles; she shall be put to the fire.

The Talmud then examines the meaning of the last two words:

פסחים עה, א

וְאֶלָּא ״בָּאֵשׁ״ לְמָה לִי? לְאַפּוֹקֵי אֲבָר מֵעִיקָּרוֹ

But if it so that the verse says “she shall be burned” to include all methods of burning, for what do I need the expression “in fire”? The Gemara answers: To exclude lead from its source.

What exactly is the meaning of “lead from its source?” Rashi, the eleventh century commentator offers this explanation:

אבר מעיקרו - שמוציאין אותו מן הקרקע רותח הוא בלא תולדת אש

Lead from its source: It is extracted from the earth in a molten form, without any additional heat from a flame.

This explanation was sufficient for the great late Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz to include it in his own commentary on this passage:

אבר מעיקרו. שבשעה שמוציאים את העופרת מקרקע היא רותחת מעצמה, ובעופרת רותחת זו אין מקיימים מצות שריפה, כיון שאין חומה בא על ידי האש

Lead from its source: When lead is mined from the ground it is molten, and the commandment of serefa [burning] cannot be performed with naturally burning lead, since it was not melted with fire…

The English ArtScroll Talmud also offers Rashi’s explanation without further comment. But it is wrong.

 
ArtScroll Talmud. Pesachim 75a.

ArtScroll Talmud. Pesachim 75a.

 

Where does lead come from?

The explanations of the great commentator Rashi and his modern day equivalent Rabbi Steinsaltz are both, unfortunately, incorrect. Lead is not mined from the ground in a molten form but is produced by smelting, in which heat is applied to a mixture of metals known as an ore in order to extract a base metal.

In 2012 a group of Israeli archeologists discovered what they claimed to be the earliest lead object in the Levant. The lead object, attached to a wooden shaft, was found in the deepest section of the large complex Ashalim cave in the northern Negev desert. Carbon dating placed it within the Chalcolithic period, late in the 5th millennium BCE. The archeologists noted that “the chemical analysis of the Ashalim Cave object indicates that the lead was likely to have been smelted from a relatively pure ore.”

Prior to the 4th millennium BCE, only a handful of lead objects made of metallic lead have been reported from datable contexts, all from northern Mesopotamia and eastern Anatolia. These include a bracelet from Yarim Tepe I found in a context dated to c. 5,700 BCE , and a small conical object from Arpachiyeh dated to the 5th millennium BCE . However, both objects were never inspected for their metallurgical properties, and their identification as being the products of lead smelting is conjectural, and is based on the rarity of native lead and the relative ease of lead smelting, which can be performed at temperatures below 800°C … Thus, it appears that the Ashalim Cave object, based on the concentration of trace elements such as cobalt, might be the earliest lead artifact proven so far to have been produced from smelted lead.

Smelted. But not harvested as natural lead.

No one knows what the lead object was used for. “We may speculate” the Israelis wrote, “that the lead object was originally used in another context, which would have made it possible to acknowledge its rarity and significance (e.g. as a macehead), before being re-used as a spindle whorl, joined to the wooden rod, at a later stage. Its eventual deposition in the deepest section of Ashalim Cave, in relation to the burial of selected individuals, serves as evidence of the symbolic significance it possessed until the final phase of its biography.”

The Ashamilm cave object. The lead cast is at the top, attached to a wooden stick. From Yahalom-Mack N, Langgut D, Dvir O, Tirosh O, Eliyahu-Behar A, Erel Y, et al. (2015) The Earliest Lead Object in the Levant. PLOS ONE 10 (12): e0142948. doi:10.13…

The Ashamilm cave object. The lead cast is at the top, attached to a wooden stick. From Yahalom-Mack N, Langgut D, Dvir O, Tirosh O, Eliyahu-Behar A, Erel Y, et al. (2015) The Earliest Lead Object in the Levant. PLOS ONE 10 (12): e0142948. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142948

Lead was originally a by-product of smelting whose goal was to extract silver, in a process known as cupellation. Analysis of the lead shows that it was likely smelted from lead ores originating in the Taurus range in Anatolia.

A retraction of sorts

Writing earlier this week on the Seforim Blog, Rabbi Dr. Shalom Z. Berger, who is one of the content editors of the Koren (Steinsaltz) Talmud gave some additional background to the question of the origin of lead. He and fellow editor Rabbi Michael “Micky” Siev, noted that “ lead is mined from the ground, and as far as we are aware, is not burning hot when it is extracted from the ground.” And so in the new English Koren Talmud they replaced the incorrect explanation with an updated one, as shown below. It is a reminder that good Talmud commentary, like good science, needs to be amended and updated when it is based on erroneous information. Rashi and Rabbi Steinsaltz would surely concur.

Koren Steinsaltz Talmud Pesachim vol IIp 65.

Koren Steinsaltz Talmud Pesachim vol IIp 65.

Print Friendly and PDF