Berachot 24a ~ Flatulence

Today’s page of Talmud continues with a scatological theme.

ברכות כב,ב

מֵיתִיבִי: הַמַּשְׁמִיעַ קוֹלוֹ בִּתְפִלָּתוֹ — הֲרֵי זֶה מִקְּטַנֵּי אֲמָנָה. הַמַּגְבִּיהַּ קוֹלוֹ בִּתְפִלָּתוֹ הֲרֵי זֶה מִנְּבִיאֵי הַשֶּׁקֶר מְגַהֵק וּמְפַהֵק — הֲרֵי זֶה מִגַּסֵּי הָרוּחַ. הַמִּתְעַטֵּשׁ בִּתְפִלָּתוֹ — סִימָן רַע לוֹ. וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים: נִיכָּר שֶׁהוּא מְכוֹעָר. הָרָק בִּתְפִלָּתוֹ — כְּאִילּוּ רָק בִּפְנֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ

כָּאן מִלְּמַטָּה...

דְּאָמַר רַב זֵירָא: הָא מִילְּתָא אִבַּלְעָא לִי בֵּי רַב הַמְנוּנָא וּתְקִילָא לִי כִּי כּוּלֵּי תַּלְמוּדַאי: הַמִּתְעַטֵּשׁ בִּתְפִלָּתוֹ סִימָן יָפֶה לוֹ, כְּשֵׁם שֶׁעוֹשִׂים לוֹ נַחַת רוּחַ מִלְּמַטָּה, כָּךְ עוֹשִׂים לוֹ נַחַת רוּחַ מִלְּמַעְלָה

One who prays loudly during his Amida prayer is among those of little faith, (as he seems to believe that the Lord cannot hear his prayer when it is uttered silently). One who raises his voice during prayer is considered to be among the false prophets (as they too were wont to cry out and shout to their gods). One who belches and yawns while praying is surely among the uncouth. One who sneezes during his prayer, for him it is a bad omen. And some say: It is clear that he is repulsive. Also, one who spits during prayer, it is tantamount to spitting in the face of the king. 

here it is referring to sneezing from below, ie. flatulence.

And so today Talmudology will review flatulence.

Research into Flatulence

Here is Mary Roach, describing the origin of the scientific study of flatulence from her jolly book Gulp: Adventures on the Alimentary Canal. (WW Norton & Company 2013, 239-240.)

“One of the earliest flatus studies on record was carried out by the Parisian physician Francois Magendie. In 1816, Magendie published a paper entitled “Note on the Intestinal Gas of a Healthy Man.” The title is misleading, for although the man in question suffered no illness, he was dead and missing his head. “In Paris” Magendie wrote in Annales de Chime et de Physique, “the condemned ordinarily, one hour or two before their execution, have a light meal.” With red wine. So French! “Digestion is thus fully active at the moment of their death.” From 1814 to 1815, the city fathers of Paris, seeming also to have lost their heads, agreed to release the bodies of four guillotined men to Magendie’s lab for a study on the chemical makeup of flatus. One to four hours after the blade had dropped, Magendie extracted gas from four points along the digestive tract and measured what he could.

Somewhat less cruelly, in 1991 two British researchers somehow convinced ten “normal volunteers” to allow them to insert a tube into their rectums in order to collect twenty-four hours’ worth of intestinal gas, (though perhaps participating in such a study indicates anything but being considered normal). The study confirmed “the variability of flatus production; the total volumes of gas expelled by the volunteers are similar to values reported by other workers, which on normal or unspecified diets range from 200 to 2460ml/24h.”

Whoopee cushion.jpg

If you think that was a weird study, there is more. In 1996 two gastroenterologists published a study with what is surely one of the all-time best titles for a medical paper: Factors Influencing Frequency of Flatus Emission by Healthy Subjects. Its purpose was “to measure the frequency of flatus emission by 25 healthy subjects and to determine if factors commonly thought to influence flatulence actually correlate with the frequency of gas passage.” They found 13 healthy women and 12 healthy men who apparently had a dedicated interest in this subject and asked them to monitor their flatulence. “Subjects scrupulously recorded the time of each passage of flatus by making a check mark at the appropriate time on a 24-hr scale.” The average number of episodes was 10, but it increased to 19 when 10g/day of lactulose was added. And despite what you may have experienced, men and women were equally gassy.


Flatulence generally has been the province of lay conjecture and scatological humor rather than serious scientific investigation. As a result, there is a paucity of simple, basic information concerning what constitutes normal with regard to flatulence
— Furne J.K and Levitt M.D. Factors Influencing Frequency of Flatus Emission by Healthy Subjects. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1996: 41 (8). 1631-1635

The Origin of Flatulence

Gas gets into our intestines either by being swallowed, diffusing from the bloodstream or as a result of bacterial metabolism. It is removed either through the mouth by (burping, or eructation as doctors like to call it) the anus (as flatus) or by our gut bacteria that metabolize it. “The net of these processes proximal to a given site in the gut” wrote two gastroenterologists in a paper titled An Understanding of Excessive Intestinal Gas “determines the volume and composition of gas passing that site; the net of these processes throughout the entire gut determines the volume and mean composition of the entire gastrointestinal gas volume.”

Most of the gasses produced in the bowel from the breakdown of food have no odor. These are nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide and methane. Nitrogen is the predominant gas when air swallowing is the major source, whereas hydrogen, carbon dioxide and methane are predominant when most of the gas is derived from bacterial metabolism.The unpleasant smell is from trace gases that contain sulfur, such as hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol (CH3SH) and dimethylsulfide. And most of the gas is actually eructed away “even though many patients deny knowledge of even a single belch a day.” Only a minority escapes as flatulence.

Correlation between age of subject and flatus frequency. From Furne J.K and Levitt M.D. Factors Influencing Frequency of Flatus Emission by Healthy Subjects. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1996: 41 (8). 1631-1635

Correlation between age of subject and flatus frequency. From Furne J.K and Levitt M.D. Factors Influencing Frequency of Flatus Emission by Healthy Subjects. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1996: 41 (8). 1631-1635

Can you Pray inside a military tank?

Rav Yosef Zvi Rimon is the rabbi of Alon Shvut South in Israel and a lot else besides. He is the Rosh Yeshiva of the Jerusalem College of Technology, and has written several books on Jewish law, which are published through Sulamot, an educational non-profit organization that he spearheads. He also serves as a someone who rules in areas of Jewish law, known Hebrew as a posek. It was in this role that he was asked by a soldier serving in the tank corps of the Israel Defense Forces whether he could pray will inside his tank. It turns out that while cooped up inside a tank during a military operation, the crew must urinate (and more) inside a plastic bag, which is then set off to one side, until such time that the crew can safely leave. Given the smell, is it permissible for a soldier to pray in this setting?

Rav Rimon discussed this with an American colleague who suggested that since the soldier was engaged in the mitzvah of the preservation of life (פיקוח נפש), he was automatically exempt from the requirement to pray. Rav Rimon took an entirely different approach, one that reflects a sensitivity to the spiritual needs of a soldier on the front lines, and that was entirely missed by the American’s response:

מעולם לא פנה אלי חייל בבקשה שאפטור אותו מתפילה. להיפך, חיילים רוצים להתפלל, חיילים רוצים קשר נוסף ומיוחד עם הקב”ה. גם חיילים שאינם דתיים חיפשו דרכים להרבות בתפילה ובקיום מצוות במציאות זו

I have never told a soldier that he is exempt from the obligation to pray. On the contrary, soldiers want to pray, and desire an additional and unique connection to the Holy One, Blessed Be He. Even soldiers who are generally not religious look for opportunities to pray…

Yes, replied the rabbi, it was permitted to pray inside the tank so long as the excreta were covered properly. And if the smells in the tank were those that the soldiers eventually became accustomed to bearing, there would be no prohibition for them to pray - although an air freshener might be a preferable intervention.

במקרה שלנו, כיוון שהחיילים התרגלו לריח, הרי שעבורם אין זה ריח רע, ויש מקום לדון האם היה ניתן להקל באופן זה אף ללא מטהר אוויר, וייתכן שבדוחק יש מקום להקל בכך, אם כי ייתכן שעדיף במקרה זה להתפלל בהרהור
:לסיכום
חיילים הנמצאים בטנק סגור, ובתוך הטנק יש צואה, ישימו את הצואה בתוך כלי סגור, וכך יוכלו להתפלל כאשר אין ריח רע. כיוון שהצואה נחשבת באופן זה כ”רשות אחרת” הרי שניתן לבטל את הריח על ידי מטהר אוויר (ובדוחק יש מקום אולי להקל, אם כל הנמצאים שם התרגלו לריח, ועבורם הוא לא משפיע).
— רב יוסף צבי רימון. תפילה בטנק שיש בו טינופת וריח רע .סולמית

A Prayer after Flatulence

The great mathematician Paul Erdos who died in 1996 described mathematicians as “machines that turn coffee into theorems.” In a similar vein we could describe the sages of the Talmud as machines that turn everyday natural occurrences into moments of metaphysical meaning, and a perfect demonstration can be found in today’s page of Talmud. While most of us consider flatulence to be a target of boyish jokes or an occurrence best ignored, the rabbis took an entirely different tack. They used it as an opportunity to praise God, and left us with what is perhaps the only example in any religion of a prayer to be recited after passing wind.

אַשְׁכְּחֵיהּ לְתַנָּא דְּקָתָנֵי קַמֵּיהּ דְּרַב יְהוּדָה: הָיָה עוֹמֵד בִּתְפִלָּה וְנִתְעַטֵּשׁ — מַמְתִּין עַד שֶׁיִּכְלֶה הָרוּחַ וְחוֹזֵר וּמִתְפַּלֵּל. אִיכָּא דְאָמְרִי: הָיָה עוֹמֵד בִּתְפִלָּה וּבִיקֵּשׁ לְהִתְעַטֵּשׁ — מַרְחִיק לְאַחֲרָיו אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת, וּמִתְעַטֵּשׁ, וּמַמְתִּין עַד שֶׁיִּכְלֶה הָרוּחַ, וְחוֹזֵר וּמִתְפַּלֵּל, וְאוֹמֵר:

״רִבּוֹנוֹ שֶׁל עוֹלָם, יְצַרְתָּנוּ נְקָבִים נְקָבִים חֲלוּלִים חֲלוּלִים, גָּלוּי וְיָדוּעַ לְפָנֶיךָ חֶרְפָּתֵנוּ וּכְלִימָּתֵנוּ בְּחַיֵּינוּ וּבְאַחֲרִיתֵנוּ רִמָּה וְתוֹלֵעָה״

אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אִילּוּ לֹא בָּאתִי אֶלָּא לִשְׁמוֹעַ דָּבָר זֶה — דַּיִּי

One who was standing in prayer and passed wind waits until the odor dissipates and resumes praying. Some say: One who was standing in prayer when he felt the need to pass wind, steps back four cubits, passes wind, waits until the odor dissipates and resumes praying. And before resuming his prayer, he says:

Master of the universe, You have formed us with many orifices and cavities; our disgrace and shame in life are clear and evident before You, as is our destiny with maggots and worms, and so we should not be judged harshly.

…Rabbi Abba said to him: Had I only come to the assembly of the Sages to hear this teaching, it would have been sufficient for me.

Print Friendly and PDF

Berachot 22b ~ Urinary Incontinence

ברכות כב,ב

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הָיָה עוֹמֵד בִּתְפִלָּה וּמַיִם שׁוֹתְתִין עַל בִּרְכָּיו — פּוֹסֵק עַד שֶׁיִּכְלוּ הַמַּיִם וְחוֹזֵר וּמִתְפַּלֵּל. לְהֵיכָן חוֹזֵר? רַב חִסְדָּא וְרַב הַמְנוּנָא, חַד אָמַר חוֹזֵר לָרֹאשׁ, וְחַד אָמַר: לְמָקוֹם שֶׁפָּסַק

The Sages taught in a baraita: One who was standing in prayer when, for some reason, urine is flowing on his knees, he must interrupt his prayer until the urine ceases, and then resume praying. The Gemara, asks: To where in the prayer does he return when he resumes his prayer? Rav Chisda and Rav Hamnuna disagreed; one said: He must return to the beginning of the prayer, and the other said: He must return to the point where he stopped.

Adult Diaper.jpg

It’s OK to talk about it - The Talmud did

Worldwide, it is estimated that over 120 million men and over 300 million women have experienced a degree of urinary incontinence. And the problem is growing rapidly. We may shy away about speaking about it, but let’s take a lesson from today’s page of Talmud, which took the first step: it acknowledged that the problem exists.

Estimated numbers of those with urinary incontinence. From Irwin DE. et al. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU International 2011:108; 1132-113…

Estimated numbers of those with urinary incontinence. From Irwin DE. et al. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU International 2011:108; 1132-1139.

Prevalence and Causes of Urinary Incontinence in men

Today, incontinence in men is far less common than in women, and this would have been true in talmudic times as well. According to a 2009 survey of the field, the estimated prevalence of urinary incontinence in men varies from 11% among those aged 60 to 64 years to 31% in older men, and from 16% among white men to 21% among African American men. Daily urinary incontinence was reported by 30%-47% and weekly incontinence by 15%-37% of community-dwelling men (that is, men who do not live in a nursing home). Here is what we know about the risk factors for male urinary incontinence:

Things that are associated with an increased risk of urinary incontinence:

Age, body weight, poor health, depression, diabetes, use of diuretic medications, cognitive impairment, memory problems, urinary tract infections, prostate disease, prostate surgery (which would not have been a problem during talmudic times),

Things that aren’t associated with an increased the risk:

Ethnicity, education, marital status, alcohol, smoking,

Things that are associated with an decreased risk:

Physical activity, coffee

Prevalence and Causes of Urinary Incontinence in women

Urinary incontinence (UI) is far more common in women across the age span, as you can see in the graph below. In a review of population studies from numerous countries, the prevalence of UI ranged from about 5% to 70%, with most studies reporting a prevalence of any UI in the range of 25–45%. Even in women who have not had children, about 17% have experienced UI. There appears to be a degree of genetics involved, since having a first-degree female family member with stress UI increases the risk for a woman becoming afflicted by the same disorder.

The main risk factor for women is pregnancy. According to a 2019 review of the topic, “pregnancy in itself, independent of labor and delivery practices, seems to be a risk factor for postpartum UI, especially if the incontinence started during the first trimester. During pregnancy, the prevalence of UI increases with gestational age so that more than half of all women report UI during the third trimester.” The good news is that in uncomplicated courses of pregnancy and labor, UI usually declines rapidly during the first 3months following childbirth, which suggests that most symptoms are part of a normal pregnancy and delivery.

Comparison of the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women and men of the same age resident in the same urban population. From Milso, I. Gyhaged M. The Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence. Climacteric 2019: 22 (3); 217-222.

Comparison of the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women and men of the same age resident in the same urban population. From Milso, I. Gyhaged M. The Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence. Climacteric 2019: 22 (3); 217-222.

Can you Pray while attached to a Urinary Catheter?

From here.

From here.

A Foley catheter is a tube that extends from the bladder through the urethra and into a bag. There are many reasons that a person might need to be attached to one, like following abdominal surgery or a complication of childbirth. May a Jew pray but while attached to this device?

Among the first rabbis to consider the question of the Foley catheter and prayer was the late Eliezer Waldenberg, (d. 2006) who was the head of the Jerusalem Rabbinic Court (Bet Din). In a 1964 responsa he ruled that a person may indeed pray while attached to a Foley and a urine collection bag, and he cited today’s page of Talmud. Among his reasons was a sensitivity to the need of the patient to be able to pray, and the fact that the Talmud did not forbid prayer within four amot of urine, (unlike the ruling regarding excrement or a bad smell, which we will address in the next installment of Talmudology). In his responsa he reviewed multiple possible objections to his ruling, which is why it stretched to twelve pages (!), and he concluded that so long as the collection bag was covered during prayer, the patient may not only pray, but wear a prayer shawl and phyalcteries (a tallit and tefillin). Rav Waldenberg’s ruling is a reminder that urinary incontinence and a prayerful life can peaceably co-exist.

Print Friendly and PDF

Berachot 20a ~ Rabbi Yochanan, Maternal Imprinting, And The Woman Who Gave Birth To Rabbits

In today’s page of Talmud we meet the great Rabbi Yochanan where you would have least expected him: sitting outside the mikveh (ritual bathhouse), waiting for the married women who used it to pass him by. And notice him.

ברכות כ,ב

רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן הֲוָה רְגִיל דַּהֲוָה קָא אָזֵיל וְיָתֵיב אַשַּׁעֲרֵי דִטְבִילָה. אֲמַר: כִּי סָלְקָן בְּנוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאָתְיָין מִטְּבִילָה, מִסְתַּכְּלָן בִּי, וְנֶהֱוֵי לְהוּ זַרְעָא דְּשַׁפִּירֵי כְּווֹתִי

Rabbi Yochanan would go and sit by the entrance to the ritual bath. He said to himself: When Jewish women come up from their immersion [after their menstruation,] they should see me first so that they have beautiful children like me

Rabbi Yochanan’s actions were not really as bizarre as it might first seem. He believed that what a mother sees around the time she conceives will affect her offspring. This belief is called maternal imprinting or psychic maternal impressions, or mental influence, or maternal imagination, or (my favorite) maternal fancy. It was widespread in the ancient world, and not uncommon in the early modern one. (Maternal imprinting also has a very modern use, when it refers to the way in which an individual phenotype is determined by the environment and genotype of its mother. But that’s most certainly not the phenomena alluded to in the Talmud.)

A surprising large number of people, in different cultures and over many centuries, have believed that a woman who imagines or sees someone other than her sexual partner at the moment of conception may imprint that image upon her child- thus predetermining its appearance, character or both.
— Doniger W. Spinner G. Female Imaginations and Male Fantasies in Parental Imprinting. Daedalus 127 (1), No. 1, Science in Culture (Winter, 1998). 97-129

OTHER Maternal Imprinting in jewish sources

spottedsheep21-300x225.jpg

The earliest mention of maternal imprinting is the story of Yaakov and his division of the goats he watched for his uncle Lavan (Gen 30:25-43, 31:1-12).  Yaakov asked for all the speckled goats as wages, while Lavan would get to keep the plain ones.  Yaakov then took several wooden rods from which he peeled the bark, and left these now speckled rods in front of a water trough.   The female goats stared at the rods while they are drinking and mating, and this in turn caused them to give birth to speckled kids, all of which Yaakov got to keep. That's how maternal imprinting works. And that's what Rav Yochanan was doing.  

The Midrash and Talmud are replete with examples of maternal imprinting. Here is another example, this one to do with cows.

The Parah Adumah

The Parah Adumah, the red heifer, was used in several ceremonies in the Temple. It was, however, a rare animal. In the Talmud (Avodah Zarah 24a) there is a discussion as to whether a red heifer born to an idol-worshipper could be used. The concern was that the heifer, or one of its ancestors, might have been used by the idol-worshipper for beastiality. Should this have happened, it was forbidden to use the red heifer as a sacrifice. The Talmud relates that in fact an idol-worshipper called Daba ben Natina had sold a red heifer to his Jewish neighbors. To insure that the heifer's mother had not been the object of beastiality, the pregnant cow had been watched "משעה שנוצרה" – from the moment it was impregnated. Then comes an obvious question: how could anyone be sure that the cow was indeed pregnant with a red calf which would warrant safeguarding her? Perhaps the calf would be born another color? 

Here is the answer: "כוס אדום מעבירין לפניה בשעה שעולה עליה זכר" -"while the mother was copulating, the farmer would show her a red cup." That would insure that she would give birth to a little red calf that would grow into a bigger red heifer. 

Rabbi Akiva and the King of Arabia

Here is another example, in which Rabbi Akiva used maternal imprinting to save a king from a rather embarrassing situation:

מדרש תנחומא נשה, ז

מַעֲשֶׂה בְּמֶלֶךְ הָעַרְבִים שֶׁשָּׁאַל אֶת רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא, אֲנִי כּוּשִׁי וְאִשְׁתִּי כּוּשִׁית וְיָלְדָה לִי בֵּן לָבָן, הוֹרְגָהּ אֲנִי, שֶׁזָּנְתָה תַּחְתַּי. אָמַר לוֹ: צוּרוֹת בֵּיתְךָ שְׁחֹרוֹת אוֹ לְבָנוֹת. אָמַר לוֹ: לְבָנוֹת. אָמַר לוֹ: כְּשֶׁהָיִיתָ עוֹסֵק עִמָּהּ, עֵינֶיהָ נָתְנָה בְּצוּרוֹת לְבָנוֹת וְיָלְדָה כַּיּוֹצֵא בָּהֶם. וְאִם תָּמֵהַּ אַתָּה בַּדָּבָר, לְמַד מִן צֹאנוֹ שֶׁל יַעֲקֹב, שֶׁמִּן הַמַּקְלוֹת הָיוּ מִתְיַחֲמוֹת, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: וְיִחֲמוּ הַצֹּאן אֶל הַמַּקְלוֹת (בראשית ל, לט). וְהוֹדָה מֶלֶךְ הָעַרְבִים וְשִׁבַּח לְרַבִּי עֲקִיבָא

A king of Arabia once asked Rabbi Akiva, “I am black and my wife is black, yet she gave birth to a white child. Shall I have her executed for infidelity?” Rabbi Akiva responded by inquiring if the statues in his house where white or black. He said to Rabbi Akiva that they were white.  Rabbi Akiva explained to the king that during conception his wife's eyes were fixed on the white statues and so she bore a white child...the king agreed and praised Rabbi Akiva

Maternal Imprinting in Greek Thought, and Beyond

In 1998 Professors Wendy Doniger and Gregory Spinner published perhaps the most comprehensive review of imprinting, in a paper titled Misconceptions: Female Imaginations and Male Fantasies in Parental Imprinting. They noted Empedocles, who lived in the fifth century BCE, wrote that 

the fetuses are shaped by the imagination of the women around the time of conception. For often women have fallen in love with statues of men, and with images, and have produced offspring which resemble them.

Soranus of Ephesus, another Greek physician who lived in Rome and Alexandria (and who was a contemporary of Rabbi Yochanan) firmly believed in imprinting, both for animal husbandry and in humans:

Some women, seeing monkeys during intercourse, have borne children resembling monkeys. The tyrant of the Cyprians, who was misshapen, compelled his wife to look at beautiful statues during intercourse and became the father of well-shaped children; and horse-breeders, during covering, place noble horses in front of the mares.

Jumping forward a millennium, in 1282 it was reported that an infant was born with hair and claws like a bear. The Pope at the time "straightway ordered the destruction of all pictures of bears in Rome." This story is from John Ballantyne, a Scottish physician who in 1897 published Teratogenesis: an Inquiry into the Causes of Monstrosities. According to Ballantyne, in the seventeenth century, the belief in maternal impressions "reigned supreme."  Here is another example of the kind of thing it led to:

 

And then things get even weirder:

In 1726 the matter of maternal impressions was brought still more prominently before the profession and the public in England in connexion [sic] with the notorious case of an "Extraordinary Delivery of Rabbets" which was alleged to have occurred in the case of Maria Tofts of Godlyman in Surrey; she had a great longing for 'Rabbets"in early pregnancy.

Pregnancy and the fetus

Maternal imprinting is a rather extreme form of what we all know to be true; that what happens to a pregnant mother affects the fetus she is carrying. Here are two of the countless examples of this.  If a mother drinks enough alcohol while pregnant, the fetus will be born with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. This syndrome includes facial abnormalities, growth delays, abnormal development of organs, and reduced immunity.  If a mother is infected with measles (rubella) early in pregnancy, the baby will likely be born with congenital rubella syndrome, which includes cataracts, congenital heart disease and brain damage.  But these examples do not imply that a woman who eats eggs will have children with large eyes or that a woman who eats an esrog will have fragrant children, as the Talmud (Ketuvot 60b) declares. Some things a pregnant mother does will have a huge effect on the fetus she carries. Some won't have any affect at all.  

John Ballantyne, the Scottish physician concluded his book noting, as we have, that of course there are some things a mother does that will affect fetal outcome. "To this extent" he wrote, "I believe in the old doctrine of maternal impressions; this is, I think, one grain of truth in an immense mass of fiction and accidental coincidence."

The history of the belief in maternal impressions is one of great antiquity...it is also one of practically world-wide distribution. [It can be found in] such far apart lands as India, China, South America, Western Asia and East Africa..the Esquimaux, the Loango negros, and the old Japanese.
— John William Ballantyne. Teratogenesis: an Inquiry into the Causes of Monstrosities. Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd 1897. 24

More on Rabbi Yochanan’s Beauty

In tractate Bava Metziah (84a) the Talmud notes that Rabbi Yochanan was indeed a very handsome man - both by his own account, and that of others:

אמר רבי יוחנן אנא אישתיירי משפירי ירושלים האי מאן דבעי מחזי שופריה דרבי יוחנן נייתי כסא דכספא מבי סלקי ונמלייה פרצידיא דרומנא סומקא ונהדר ליה כלילא דוורדא סומקא לפומיה ונותביה בין שמשא לטולא ההוא זהרורי מעין שופריה דר' יוחנן 

Rabbi Yochanan said: I alone remain of the beautiful people of Jerusalem. 

The Gemara continues: One who wishes to see something resembling the beauty of Rabbi Yochanan should bring a new, shiny silver goblet from the smithy and fill it with red pomegranate seeds and place a diadem of red roses upon the lip of the goblet, and position it between the sunlight and shade. That luster is a semblance of Rabbi Yochanan’s beauty.

And never shying away from calling things as he saw them, Rav Pappa had this to say about another beautiful feature of Rav Yochanan

אמר רב פפא איבריה דרבי יוחנן כחמת בת חמשת קבין ואמרי לה בת שלשת קבין

The organ of Rabbi Yochanan was the size of a jug of five kav, and some say it was the size of a jug of three kav.

Well thanks for that. Rabbi Yochanan’s beauty was so great that it attracted Reish Lakish, then a highwayman, to abandon his ways and turn to the study of Torah.

יומא חד הוה קא סחי ר' יוחנן בירדנא חזייה ריש לקיש ושוור לירדנא אבתריה אמר ליה חילך לאורייתא אמר ליה שופרך לנשי א"ל אי הדרת בך יהיבנא לך אחותי דשפירא מינאי קביל עליה בעי למיהדר לאתויי מאניה ולא מצי הדר 

The Gemara relates: One day, Rabbi Yochanan was bathing in the Jordan River. Reish Lakish saw him and jumped into the Jordan, pursuing him. At that time, Reish Lakish was the leader of a band of marauders. Rabbi Yochanan said to Reish Lakish: “Your strength is fit for Torah study.” Reish Lakish said to him: “Your beauty is fit for women.” Rabbi Yochanan said to him: “If you return to the pursuit of Torah, I will give you my sister in marriage, who is more beautiful than I am.”

Passing on what is really important

The story of Rabbi Yochanan sitting outside the mikveh doing some maternal imprinting is told twice in the Babylonian Talmud: once in today’s page of Talmud and a second time in Bava Metziah. In that second telling the Talmud adds an additional phrase, one not found in today’s passage.

בבא מציעא פד, א

ר' יוחנן הוה אזיל ויתיב אשערי טבילה אמר כי סלקן בנות ישראל מטבילת מצוה לפגעו בי כי היכי דלהוו להו בני שפירי כוותי גמירי אורייתא כוותי

Rabbi Yochanan would go and sit by the entrance to the ritual bath. He said to himself: When Jewish women come up from their immersion [after their menstruation,] they should see me first so that they have beautiful children like me, and as learned of the Torah as I am…

In this other version of the story, Rav Yochanan was not only interested in passing on his physical beauty. He was just as interested in passing on the Torah wisdom that he had accumulated. And despite what he and others believed, passing that on takes a lot more than a glancing look at a rabbi. However attractive he might have been.


[Special thanks to Rabbi Dr. Eddie Reichman, medical historian and Talmudology reader who has been researching maternal imprinting for years, and was kind enough to share his material. Mostly a repost from here.]

Print Friendly and PDF

Berachot 10b ~ The Snake as a Symbol of Healing

In much of the Talmud snakes are associated with coma, convulsions and death.  But occasionally - and paradoxically -  they are sometimes associated with those healing, and those who heal. Let’s begin with today’s page of Talmud.

ברכות י, א

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: שִׁשָּׁה דְבָרִים עָשָׂה חִזְקִיָּהוּ הַמֶּלֶךְ, עַל שְׁלֹשָׁה הוֹדוּ לוֹ, וְעַל שְׁלֹשָׁה לֹא הוֹדוּ לוֹ 

עַל שְׁלֹשָׁה הוֹדוּ לוֹ: גָּנַז סֵפֶר רְפוּאוֹת — וְהוֹדוּ לוֹ. כִּתֵּת נְחַשׁ הַנְּחשֶׁת — וְהוֹדוּ לוֹ. גֵּירַר עַצְמוֹת אָבִיו עַל מִטָּה שֶׁל חֲבָלִים — וְהוֹדוּ לוֹ

The Sages taught: King Hezekiah performed six innovative actions. With regard to three the Sages agreed with him, and with regard to three they did not agree with him.

With regard to three actions the Sages agreed with him:  He suppressed the Book of Remedies, and they agreed with him.  He ground the copper snake through which miracles were performed for Israel (Numbers 21:9), destroying it because it had been used in idol worship (II Kings 18:4), and they agreed with him…

You might have heard that the symbol for healing, that snake (or is it two snakes?) wrapped around a central pole, came from the episode to which today’s page of Talmud is referring. In Numbers 21 the Children of Israel complain that “there is no bread and no water, and we have come to loathe this miserable food.” So God sends fiery snakes “that bit the people and many of the Israelites died.” Let’s let the Good Book tell the rest:

7-10 :במדבר כא

וַיָּבֹא הָעָם אֶל־מֹשֶׁה וַיֹּאמְרוּ חָטָאנוּ כִּי־דִבַּרְנוּ בַיהוָה וָבָךְ הִתְפַּלֵּל אֶל־יְהוָה וְיָסֵר מֵעָלֵינוּ אֶת־הַנָּחָשׁ וַיִּתְפַּלֵּל מֹשֶׁה בְּעַד הָעָם׃

וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה עֲשֵׂה לְךָ שָׂרָף וְשִׂים אֹתוֹ עַל־נֵס וְהָיָה כָּל־הַנָּשׁוּךְ וְרָאָה אֹתוֹ וָחָי׃

וַיַּעַשׂ מֹשֶׁה נְחַשׁ נְחֹשֶׁת וַיְשִׂמֵהוּ עַל־הַנֵּס וְהָיָה אִם־נָשַׁךְ הַנָּחָשׁ אֶת־אִישׁ וְהִבִּיט אֶל־נְחַשׁ הַנְּחֹשֶׁת וָחָי׃

וַיִּסְעוּ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיַּחֲנוּ בְּאֹבֹת׃ 

The people came to Moses and said, “We sinned by speaking against the LORD and against you. Intercede with the LORD to take away the serpents from us!” And Moses interceded for the people.

Then the LORD said to Moses, “Make a seraph figure and mount it on a standard. And if anyone who is bitten looks at it, he shall recover.” 

Moses made a copper serpent and mounted it on a standard; and when anyone was bitten by a serpent, he would look at the copper serpent and recover.

The Israelites marched on and encamped at Oboth.

But you’d be wrong. In fact the episode in the Bible and the fiery snakes that cured has nothing to do with this medical symbol of healing.

From the beginning of the 17th century, the figure of Asklepios began appearing on medical medals and calling cards. The same pattern seen in antiquity emerged: The symbol was used only in a medical context, whereas the caduceus, although used by some medical organizations, was associated with other fields, especially commerce, communications, chemistry, and pharmacy
— Robert A. Wilcox. Emma M. Whitham. The Symbol of Modern Medicine: Why One Snake Is More Than Two. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:673-677.
Rosner Book.jpg

SNAKES THAT HEAL

Here is the cover of Fred Rosner's book; notice what looks like two snakes wrapped around a winged pole.  Compare that image with the insignia of the US Army Medical Corps below.

The image you see is the caduceus, the rod carried by the Greek god Hermes (known as Mercury when he was in Rome). But in fact this double-snake flying-rod has nothing to do with healing, and is erroneously -though very widely- used as a medical emblem.  As an article in the Annals of Internal Medicine points out, the adoption of the double-snaked caduceus of Hermes - at least in the US - is likely due to its having been used as a watermark by the prolific medical publisher John Churchill.   

The correct mythological association is with the Staff  of Asklepios, the ancient Greco-Roman god of medicine. The opening lines of the Hippocratic Oath clearly reveal the central role occupied by Asklepios (and his mythologic daughters, Hygieia and Panakeia,) in the hearts and minds of the ancients: “I swear by Apollo Physician and Asklepios and Hygieia and Panakeia and all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will fulfill according to my ability and judgement this oath and this covenant . . .”

In one legend, a snake placed some herbs into the mouth of another serpent that Asklepios had killed, and the dead snake was restored to life.  As a mark of respect, Asklepios adopted as his emblem a snake coiled around his staff.  While the US Army Medical Corps uses the caducues as its badge, on its regimental flag the US Army Medical Command uses the more appropriate single snaked staff. Oh, and a rooster.  

 
U.S. Army Medical Command Regimental Flag. Don't ask about the rooster...

U.S. Army Medical Command Regimental Flag. Don't ask about the rooster...

 

Fortunately, the Israel Defense Forces clearly know a caduceus from an Asklepios. They adopted the correct Greco-Roman mythological symbol for the medical unit of the first Jewish army in 2,000 years.

 
Insignia of the IDF Medical Corps.
 

 

The Greeks may have had their tradition, but we have ours. And as the Midrash notes, in ours, it is never the snake that heals.

עשה לך שרף ושים אותו על נס, והיה כל הנשוך וראה אותו וחי. וכי נחש ממית או נחש מחיה? אלא בזמן שישראל מסתכלין כלפי מעלה ומשעבדין את לבם לאביהן שבשמים היו מתרפאים, ואם לאו היו נימוקים...

”Make a fiery snake and place it on a pole, and it will be that anyone who is bitten will look at it and live” [Numbers 21:8] But is a snake the source of life and death? Rather, the verse means that when Israel looked up and submitted their heart to their Father in Heaven, they were healed, but if they did not do so, they perished.
— Mishnah Rosh Hashanah 3:8

[A repost from here.]

Print Friendly and PDF